Monthly Archives: July 2014

Wild! Paper and Silver Ink

I decided to order some Wild! paper to give it a try. It is a cotton paper specifically designed for letterpress and it has a nice neutral white texture with a more pronounced texture. When I got it in, I wasn’t too keen on the look of the texture, but after printing with it I was pleasantly surprised with how well it took ink and the pillowy impression. I also tried out some cheap black cardstock I got from Michael‘s and a nicer grey Poptone French paper. I know a lot of printers use French’s Poptone line for its bright colors and generally I think the paper printed and scored nicely.

Below you can see my little scoring device. I picked it up at a thrift store and have been pleased with its clever design and easy of use when I only have to score a few things. Scoring on press works better for cottony papers because there is more pressure and accuracy, but this little thing was a sweet find for just a couple dollars. 

IMG_2701 IMG_2702

This little scoring device has a handle that you pull down which presses a line of steel rule into the paper leaving a nice score. 


I decided to work with silver ink for the next experiment because it has the best opacity on dark papers. 


IMG_2707 IMG_2708

Both papers printed nicely, but I was really pleased with how sharp and clean the ink laid down on the Wild! paper. I will definitely be suggesting it to future clients. It’s priced closely to Lettra but it’s stiffer and perhaps a bit thicker. It also took this nice bite with virtually zero show through or burnishing on the back. On a side note, it does not score any better than Lettra. Thick cottony papers just weren‘t meant to be folded. 



Working with halftones is not the easiest thing with letterpress. It doesn’t quite work like screen printing and four color process is not necessarily something recommended for this sort of printing. This is just the beginning stage of a longer experiment with what works, and what doesn’t with halftones.

Watercolor Wedding: Success

You may have noticed a previous post where I did a wedding invite with a watercolor halftone background. In this case, the halftone was a success. The soft feathery image gave some wiggle room if the ink didn’t lay down perfectly and it was all meant to look like one color. For this job I began with a black and white bitmap image and sent it straight to Boxcar Press with instructions to have it made into a 100 LPI halftone plate.

IMG_2363 IMG_2352

pinkwedding invitedetail

Two Tone Invite: Ehh…

Success with the previous project prompted me to try something a little more challenging – a two tone graphic invite. I wanted to be able to print a one color invite, but get the feeling of a two color invite by using one solid color and a screen to make a tint. This did not work out as well as I had hoped. Ultimately, I should have just printed it in two colors, but you can’t blame me for trying. I did the invites for a friend and was given free reign to do as I pleased, she was still really happy with them, but I rated the experiment a ‘fail’ simply because the two-tone effect was not achieved satisfactorily.


Above you can see the file. There was a lot more contrast between the lighter tone and the darker tone. I set the tint to 30% which looked good digitally and had boxcar make a 100LPI plate. Still, when I went to print it came out much darker. I added a nice plum edge painting to add some pizazz and make up for the lack luster two tone effect.

DNInvite DNDetail

Two Tone Holiday Cards: Failure

I was determined to try for a two tone effect again, this time I was going to create a much greater contrast between the solid and the screen area. I dropped it down to about 15%, but I had the same issue – the contrast when it was printed was not enough. The effect is there…. but barely. In either case, when you have a large screen like in the images below, it’s difficult to get solid ink coverage, it ends up with a slightly mottled effect. I didn’t really mind it and knew it would be a part of the final design, but I’m unhappy with the contrast between the solid and the screen. I’m wondering if it’s the density of the LPI I’m asking for. Perhaps if I space the dots farther with say a 50LPI screen the effect will be better. I can’t seem to figure out the secret, but I’m planning to try again.

daddypenguin-01 mamacat-01





Conclusion # 1:

Halftones weren’t really designed for letterpress (I basically confirmed what I was already told hah!). I will probably try and update this post with a third attempt – this time to create a third color by overlapping two colors. I’ve seen it done, and it’s quite beautiful, but I’ll have to try and figure it out on my own. There are clearly some limitations to this technique. I may also try a two tone image again but with a more open screen and see if that makes a difference. Honestly, these weren’t difficult to print and I had no issues with filling in the screen areas, so if I can find the sweet spot, it could be a neat thing to add into the repertoire. If anyone else has had halftone success let me know what you did!


So I couldn’t accept that as that, and I have a second set of experiments. I talked to the lovely people at Concord Engraving – the new place I am ordering plates from – and they made me up a test plate. The gent over there, Max suggested I try a differently shaped dot… a Euclidian dot to be precise. Check this link. Also, see below.

Round Dot Euclidean Dot

On the left is a round dot, and on the right is a euclidian dot. Apparently, differently shaped dots have different press advantages and disadvantages.

This was the proof of the test plate they sent me –


You can see that each bar has a different LPI. This proof was printed on a Vandercook.

Well, it looked great, but I had to test it on a few different papers.

IMG_2849 IMG_2850

I ended up cutting down the plate a bit. First thing I noticed (remembered) is that halftone plates need SO much ink. I had to keep adding ink, and even then I think my proofs, being on cottony papers, were still a little off on the ink

halftone010 halftone011

You can see that on the low end of the scale, they look very even, but it was on the dark low end that I started to lose a lot of ink coverage. This is probably most due to the cottony paper types, as the slicker coated stocks worked better. I used Crane Colors (orange), Crane Lettra, Wild!, and some cheap brown bag paper form Michael’s. I liked the inking on the Wild! (middle above the brown bag) best, but I think that was from the heavy impression caused by not changing the packing.

Let us compare the plates above to the proofs from my previous plates with regular round dots.


This watercolor blotch actually turned out pretty good. I didn’t have too much trouble. This was sent as a bitmap image to Boxcar with instructions to do a 100 LPI screen. 


This proof is where the problems appear. I don’t mind the uneven pattern, simply the lack of contrast. I learned that this darkening is called dot gain which is caused when the dots in the halftone grow. Check out this video. These two tone images above are at 15% and 100% and yet, look much more like 80% and 100%. The new plates with the euclidian dots show a better range at the high (tint) end even up at 133 LPI.

Conclusion #2:

The conclusion is still in progress. I have plans to try the two tone with the new dot shape on an upcoming wedding invite, we shall yet see… But do check out the following links for some more details on halftone letterpress –